Page 10 of 57
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:33 pm
by Zerb
i may just get the two piecers if the time comes and i dont find anything else i like...
importvisions.com has them, at least on their site theyve got em.
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:02 pm
by speeding-g60
http://www.directconnectiontuning.com/hids.htmland here seems a very good price on HID's, even H4 dual beam ones

Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:16 pm
by Zerb
but dont you need the projector style headlight housings in order for the HIDs to look halfway decent? which is why the RS2's would be tits.
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:30 pm
by speeding-g60
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:57 am
by Zerb
soooo...if one didnt care about shining the shit out of others, you could just throw HID's in any old headlight.
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:01 am
by speeding-g60
my thoughts. but leave the reflector thing in the headlight housing that blocks direct view of the bulb... i know we used to take that little thing out back in the day....
i think the projector housings make a tighter beam pattern... but bright is still bright.
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:39 am
by Zerb
all i know is that anything>stock b3 headlights at night.
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:32 pm
by Zerb
got a nice package this afternoon....
83.5mm. 8.5:1comp. holla.



Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:36 pm
by Hank
ahhhhhh... Looking at nice JE's never gets old..
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:52 pm
by speeding-g60
i wont get to see mine out of the block. oh well....
dey looks nice....
but why so low on the compression?
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:57 pm
by Zerb
caaauuuuuuse thats what i wanted, lol. :x
but really....idk, issam asked what comp, i said 8.5:1, he said ok, and that was that, haha
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 6:59 pm
by Zerb
on a side note, looking into getting a fuel level gauge for my stock sender and was wondering what everyones opinions on....
autometer gauge=240-33
stock level sender= 280-40
do able or what?
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:22 pm
by q20v
Holy snap those pistons are the bees knees, that is EXACTLY what I need for my 7A, except 83mm instead of 83.5mm!!
VERY NICE!!!!!!!!!!!
:woowoo:
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:30 pm
by Wizard-of-OD
speeding-g60 wrote:but why so low on the compression?
NOW YOU BETTER LISTEN!!!!!!!11!!!

Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:40 pm
by speeding-g60
Wizard-of-OD wrote:speeding-g60 wrote:but why so low on the compression?
NOW YOU BETTER LISTEN!!!!!!!11!!!

huh? me go 11.0:1?
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:15 pm
by Zerb
low comp+big boost=big powerz...

idk, i just talked to a few peeps who build these motor things here and they said, go low. so...i did.
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:42 pm
by Wizard-of-OD
That 83.5mm bore is going to give a couple of people the shits tho...

Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:32 pm
by RSCoupe
How much material is left between the bores at 83.5mm?
It would be next to nothing on the I5's.
8.5:1 is perfect for high boost.
No coating on the piston face?
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:34 pm
by Zerb
RSCoupe wrote:How much material is left between the bores at 83.5mm?
It would be next to nothing on the I5's.
No coating on the piston face?
first question, ill have to leave for issam to answer, cause im honestly not sure.
as for the coating on the piston face, i was thinking about getting it coated by swain tech. but the funds just arent there, and im moving foward.
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:37 pm
by Wizard-of-OD
RSCoupe wrote:How much material is left between the bores at 83.5mm?
It would be next to nothing on the I5's.
8.5:1 is perfect for high boost.
No coating on the piston face?
With an 88mm bore spacing that leaves 4.5mm spacing between the bores.
The difference between the 83.5mm bore and 83mm is a radius of approx 0.01".Grand scheme of things...not that much.
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:15 pm
by loxxrider
<--------- Jealous
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 1:35 pm
by Zerb
so....im ditching the stock tank sump idea, and opted for an easy fuel cell. other problem i was going to tun into was stuffing the foam into the bottom of the stock tank, getting it to not move around, cutting it out for the sender to fit, and then getting a gauge (that autometer doesnt seem to make) to match the stock fuel sender ohms.....so....a couple bucks later....fuel cell....
do i mount it....
where the stock tank sits right up against the rear seat backs....

as you can see itll be easy to run the lines for that down to the 044 pumps under the car. theres also the option then of putting the pumps in the trunk down in the spare wheel well(im sure thatll be noisey....but who cares about noise).
in a happy medium....

this would maybe kill the idea of putting the pumps up in the trunk, which wouldnt be detrimental to me by any means....but id have to weld in some metal so that the tank sits flat and has something to bolt the straps down to.
all the way in the back...

the pumps would now have to be under the car. lines would be a bit tight back there, but still do-able. im just not sure if its a good idea to have all that weight back behind the tires. the other two positions would allow for the tank to be a bit more centered over the tires.
itd be a pain to fill the tank up with the first position, not too too bad with the second idea, easy for the third position. i brought a gas pump nozzle home from work to test out this theory.
soooo....WHAT SHOULD I DO?
i know there would be reasons to going with one over the others....but i just dont know them. so...school me.
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 2:03 pm
by speeding-g60
not sure on all of this.....
i originally did a 12 gal cell in the rabbit. thought i was gonna street drive it. much like you will drive it on the street. one thing i learned is that when you run a cell in the car, inside, you have to make a box/firewall to protect the inside of the car from the cell. is your car a full trunk? that may be your way around it if it is....
and i am not sure, but i do not think you can have fuel pumps inside the car? i never did at any rate. quote the rulebook:
"1:5 Fuel Systems
Location: All fuel tanks, lines, pumps, valves, etc. must be outside of the driver's compartment and within the confines of the frame and/or steel body."
i like the second idea. and you can change the lid on the thing to be one with a 45 degree angle, i have one of those around here. point it to the back, easy fill then.
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 2:11 pm
by Zerb
there is a wall of metal running from side to side in the car....pretty much what you lean your back on when youre in the back seats, aside from the plushy stuff thatll never be in there ever again.
so im thinking that would serve as my 'wall' from the drivers compartment, but still be within the confines of the steel body.
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 3:05 pm
by RSCoupe
Why don't you put the tank all the way back, like in the third picture, but rotate it 180* so the lines point towards the front? You can then put the pumps in front of it, with an access panel in the firewall to get to them for replacement/maintenance.
Having the tank all the way back will actually help your center of gravity since the car is normally so nose heavy.