Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Document and share your build!
my2000apb
Posts: 1944
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 11:52 am
Location: CT

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by my2000apb »

does it run yet?
Hank
Posts: 1718
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:16 am

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by Hank »

Hmmmm. Is it time?
User avatar
Audilard
Posts: 1253
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:00 pm
Location: Draper, UT

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by Audilard »

The fenders were cut up last time I glanced at the old urQ. What are doing to rectify that by March?
Darin
1989 80 20vt
User avatar
Marc
Posts: 1586
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:33 pm

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by Marc »

Hank wrote:Hmmmm. Is it time?


yes. yes it is.
Marc Swanson
Proprietor, EFI Motorsport
User avatar
audifreakjim
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:00 pm

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by audifreakjim »

Yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
chaloux
Posts: 3167
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:43 am
Location: Muskoka, Ontario, Canada

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by chaloux »

Please tell me dad's engine is in it!! Running!! :o
Matt

18 Silverado 1500 work pig, roof rack and tonneau cover
11 Jetta sedan TDI DSG, rear muffler delete
GONE :( 87 4ktq - 4 FOX SNAKES

Image
Hank
Posts: 1718
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:16 am

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by Hank »

Darin, the fenders are being widened just a hair to get 255 r comps in comfortably. Also going on is a different groupe A bumper and thrn a sport quattro grill and lights. This will allow a hair more room for heat exchangers and routing I want. I though about going full LWB but i dont have the heart to cut up my clean shell.

Matt. Yes, that is the plan. I really need to finish thr 07k devel and put this project to thr masses. We have more employees now and the capacity to knock this out

Marc, i think i want to run a harness to the trunk on thr Urq too. I like that in the TTRS
User avatar
chaloux
Posts: 3167
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:43 am
Location: Muskoka, Ontario, Canada

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by chaloux »

Hank wrote:Matt. Yes, that is the plan. I really need to finish thr 07k devel and put this project to thr masses. We have more employees now and the capacity to knock this out




Makes me so warm inside
Matt

18 Silverado 1500 work pig, roof rack and tonneau cover
11 Jetta sedan TDI DSG, rear muffler delete
GONE :( 87 4ktq - 4 FOX SNAKES

Image
User avatar
ringbearer
Posts: 1282
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:50 pm
Location: Nor-Cal

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by ringbearer »

Things must be going well if your car gets an honorable internet mention ;)

Hope you get to walk some TTRS guys soon!
Hank
Posts: 1718
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:16 am

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by Hank »

Just mostly want it driving this spring getting data instead of being a car in the corner. The interest in 07k is high but I ethically dont feel good saying it will make 1000hp without actually doing it. So yeah that is the plan.
User avatar
audifreakjim
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:00 pm

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by audifreakjim »

:guns:
Hank
Posts: 1718
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:16 am

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by Hank »

So, we have set Fridays and then Saturday mornings as the "URQ days" to get a push on the process. "doing it on our spare time" has not made a car run in 2 years, so we are just going to knock it out.

We worked on the front end today and turbo/downpipe.

First the front end. I want more front end room, plus I want more airflow . My car was a little tired from a minor previous owner fender bender. I ordered a Group 4 front bumper, a sport quattro front grill and some SQ head lights. The end goal is something like this.

Image

I'll post more on that tomorrow, but we started cutting and modifying the wider SQ grill today to make it happen. ONce that is in place, I'll set the buckets for the lights with frames, then weld them in.

Next was a header and downpipe. This will allow us to make the heat exchangers, oil/water lines, exhaust, intake/filter, and also situate the oil filter/cooler.

Turbo is EFR 9174. I decided to make the header with an external gate as I want to run the larger 1.05 and 1.45AR housings(shown), and they are not available IWG. I really want to be able to run the 7163 without a spool valve at road race events, so I'll just need a different downpipe for both turbos. No big deal really. The 9174 on a spool valve on a 2.2L is a lot of fun, though it is too much compressor at a .92 A/R with the valve closed. This makes it surge pretty bad. You can drive around it, but I think the 1.05 will be in the sweet spot, and 1.45 will be massive 850whp fun with full boost ~4400-8500 on the valve. See with BW turbos, the scroll ratio is 65% when closed, so a 1.45 will act like a .94AR and a 1.05 will act like a .68AR. I think there is a chance the 1.05 won't surge, as well. but a .92 at .59AR was too much on the Mule.

Tons more plays into surge, such as low end VE, which the 07k absolutely destroys the 2.2L on an aggressive cam, so it may just get away with .92 on a valve anyway. Only way to find out is try. Matchbot helps, but it is too close to the surge line to make a definitive call.

Hope to finalize the endcaps for the radiator tomorrow so I can get them cutting on the CNC machine, then order an intercooler core for next friday.

Enjoy

Image
Image
Image
User avatar
pilihp2
Posts: 1106
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:18 am
Location: Reno, Nv

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by pilihp2 »

me likey mucho
-Phil
87 5ktq - 20vt
91 v8 5spd - Why?
05 S4 - Gone and very much so forgotten
14 TDI Touareg

-Terrible at responding to PM's
Hank
Posts: 1718
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:16 am

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by Hank »

http://www.turbos.bwauto.com/aftermarke ... sin=92044&

If anyone wants to look at the matchbot
User avatar
chaloux
Posts: 3167
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:43 am
Location: Muskoka, Ontario, Canada

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by chaloux »

I'm guessing with the big turbos you're not going to be using the small dia header right? What did you figure it was good for, ~600 whp or something?

Oh. And I LOVE this plan and progress!
Matt

18 Silverado 1500 work pig, roof rack and tonneau cover
11 Jetta sedan TDI DSG, rear muffler delete
GONE :( 87 4ktq - 4 FOX SNAKES

Image
User avatar
ringbearer
Posts: 1282
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:50 pm
Location: Nor-Cal

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by ringbearer »

Love it, no such thing as spare time! (or money for that matter)
Hank
Posts: 1718
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:16 am

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by Hank »

There are 4g63s making 800whp on 1.25" schedule 10 manifold headers. I think 1.5" is close to overkill in all mortal situations on a 5 cylinder. Probably will offer a small diameter ur20vt header this soring as well
User avatar
PRY4SNO
Posts: 2430
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 5:14 pm
Location: Edmonton, AB

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by PRY4SNO »

Hank... you magnificent bastard. Keep it up.

Any plans to offer a long radius bend manifold similar to a Peter G. manifold?
Find me on Instagram @pry4sno

|| 2010 Golf Sportwagen TDI /// #farmenwagen
|| 2002 Dodge Ram 2500 24vt 4x4 #bertancummins
|| 1992 80 quattro 20v /// Eventual AAN'd Winter Sled
|| 1990 Coupe quattro /// Because Racecar
Hank
Posts: 1718
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:16 am

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by Hank »

I don't know who Peter G. is. Sorry, don't get around much anymore. Got pics?
User avatar
Mcstiff
Posts: 2003
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 4:16 pm
Location: Erie, CO

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by Mcstiff »

uploadfromtaptalk1452967490016.jpg
uploadfromtaptalk1452967490016.jpg (20.56 KiB) Viewed 36471 times

Image
He was a fabricator in Europe, died years ago.
SEStone
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 9:45 pm
Location: Redmond, WA
Contact:

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by SEStone »

I am 100000% down to make spark plug runs for this thing.

Sam
Sam Stone
Aktapod
Posts: 443
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:51 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by Aktapod »

That header is a work of art!
Kevin (Sven)
- 1991 200 20vt K24-7400 AAN
- 1991 200 20vt Avant K24-7400 VEMS
- 1992 Audi V8 5-speed swap + ABZ
- 2002 Audi S8 6-speed swap
- 1979 Audi Fox quattro 20vt
- 2003 RS6 6mt Stage 2
User avatar
audifreakjim
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:00 pm

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by audifreakjim »

Can't wait to see this back on the road again! Glad to see it getting love.
955urs6
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2015 2:49 pm

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by 955urs6 »

What are the performance benefits of a long runner vs short runner header? I assume it is analagous to long vs short ram intakes?
1995.5 Audi S6- EFR7163 ts w/ qsv, Iroz mani/dp,vems, e85. Ti rods, 01E 6sp (in progress)
2003 Audi A4 3.0 6M, 225k
1985 BMW M635CSi, Dinan 3.92L stroker 360hp
Hank
Posts: 1718
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:16 am

Re: Hanks URQ 2.6L Autopsy

Post by Hank »

Long tubes typically just allow for less harsh bends that kill velocity and flow. The downside is they typically don't package anywhere, and the added runner volume makes them have later powerbands. They do theoretically make for more turbine efficiency though. IMO, it isn't enough gain to rationalize on 99% of the builds.
Post Reply